Do you think DNA was created by intelligence or happen stance? - blueprints sand rail
Note that the models are naturally occurring - without the assistance of a "designer required". Many models are produced in nature, the snowflakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, sand dunes, stalactites, rivers and ocean waves. These trends are the natural result of what scientists categorize as chaos and fractals. These things are well understood and we experience every day.
Codes do not work without a designer. Examples of symbolic codes include music, drawing, languages such as English and Chinese, computer programs, and the DNA. The main difference is the difference between model and code. Chaos can produce patterns, but have never been shown to produce codes or symbols. To store codes and symbols of the information, not a property of matter and energy alone. INFORMATIONn itself is a separate entity on a par with matter and energy.
Is this evidence that DNA was designed by a ghost? (1) The DNA is a molecule with only one model, but a code, a language and a storage mechanism. (2) All codes we know the source deliberately precipitated by a.
You could say the following:
1) man-made DNA --
2) Aliens designed DNA --
3) DNA was randomly and spontaneously
4 It must be) an undiscovered law of physics that the information generated
5) DNA was designed by a super intelligence
What do you think? And I repeat that I am neither a Christian or an atheist (not decided yet), but I'm from that fascinated what people say and even if I disagreewith your answer, feel free, its best choice, since it is a considered response. Thanks in advance!
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Blueprints Sand Rail Do You Think DNA Was Created By Intelligence Or Happen Stance?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Spontanelously forms of nucleotides of DNA. His are the laws of chemistry that the code generated. An injection of DNA does not mean anything by itself. Use make tRNA, mRNA, and a number of factors, co-enzymes and amino acids, the meaning of the whole. Everything indicates that the bearded man in the sky, I think.
ReplyDeletePink Lemur. As a scientist I proteins, which work really well all week. DNA can, my DNA, I encode proteins. Nucleotide bases can be made by chemists. This I have not really done themselves.
There is a difference between a linguistic code and a molecular structure, only if the various enzymes and molecules can succeed really fit in the 3D space. You can not establish an analogy between physical objects and non-physical things. It is a fallacy, that whole argument about "codes" is debatable.
ReplyDeleteDNA is a chain of chemicals that react with other chemicals. It is entirely possible that you have started as a single molecule with another, then more, then more in the order of several billion years into the complex structure we know today "hui.
ReplyDeleteThe acceptance of DNA is present constitutes acceptance of evolution. Changes may, without interference from outside. Ergo, there was no outside interference, and DNA was only by chance. Well, not specifically to chance.
ReplyDeleteGod created man and we discover the intelligence of the individual components of human genes. However, we do not have the power, a cure for death and other unknown diseases create.
ReplyDeleteIf the codes do not exist without a designer, then in the case of DNA, the scientists a metaphor to explain the function.
ReplyDelete